Send us a link

Subscribe to our newsletter

COMPare: a Prospective Cohort Study Correcting and Monitoring 58 Misreported Trials in Real Time

COMPare: a Prospective Cohort Study Correcting and Monitoring 58 Misreported Trials in Real Time

This is the first empirical study of major academic journals’ willingness to publish a cohort of comparable and objective correction letters on misreported high-impact studies.

Addressing Integrity Challenges in Research: the Institutional Dimension

Addressing Integrity Challenges in Research: the Institutional Dimension

Concern for and interest in research integrity has increased significantly during recent decades, both in academic and in policy discourse.

Do Models Affect Junior Doctors’ Trust in Journals?

Do Models Affect Junior Doctors’ Trust in Journals?

A recently published study in Research Integrity and Peer Review, that surveyed 178 trainee doctors, finds that although peer review is perceived as an important means of quality control by this community, there is little value placed on being able to scrutinize peer review themselves.

The History of Peer Review

The History of Peer Review

The report from SpotOn, 'What might peer review look like in 2030?' has now been published. This blog contains a section on the history of peer review from Frank Norman. Read the full report from SpotOn 2016 here.

Publishing Better Science Through Better Data

Publishing Better Science Through Better Data

Last Wednesday, I attended a conference called Publishing Better Science Through Better Data at the Wellcome Collection, organized by Scientific Data.

Recognition for review: rewarding contribution - BioMed Central blog

Recognition for review: rewarding contribution - BioMed Central blog

Many reviewers feel that some form of public acknowledgment is more valuable than monetary payment when it comes to their services.

Peer review – do we need gradual improvements or a revolution?

Peer review – do we need gradual improvements or a revolution?

How editors conduct peer review, how this process is evolving and whether we can trust the new players entering the field, the responsibilities of reviewers and how to recognize and reward all the effort put in to peer review.

Measuring gender when you don’t have a gender measure: constructing a gender index using survey data

Measuring gender when you don’t have a gender measure: constructing a gender index using survey data

This study outlines the development of a gender index, focused on gender roles and institutionalised gender, using secondary survey data from the Canadian Labour Force survey. Using this index we then examined the distribution of gender index scores among men and women, and changes in gender roles among male and female labour force participants between 1997 and 2014.