ELife Supports PREreview's New Peer Review Mentoring Program for Early-Career Researchers
ELife Supports PREreview's New Peer Review Mentoring Program for Early-Career Researchers

Send us a link
Appointing early-career researchers to positions of influence within scientific societies would be mutually beneficial for both.
DORA has evolved into an active initiative that gives practical advice to institutions on new ways to assess and evaluate research. This article outlines a framework for driving institutional change.
As the world attempts to cope with the devastating impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, researchers about to start PhDs and postdocs face particular challenges.
eLife is making changes to its policies on peer review in response to the impact of COVID-19 on the scientific community.
We announce the participants and projects joining our new mentorship and open leadership training programme.
The study of science itself is a growing field of research. Also known as meta-science or the science of science, it involves studying the processes and decisions that shape the evolution of scientific research. This collection of articles highlights the breadth of meta-research with articles on topics as diverse as gender bias in peer review, statistical power in clinical trials and the readability of the scientific literature.
We invite you to join our mentorship programme designed for innovators in open science and research communication.
The working example represents a major milestone in the development of Libero Publisher, a community-supported tool to help modernise academic publishing.
The impacts of grief are long-lasting, but support from colleagues provides some relief.
Alex Freeman describes how her love for storytelling propelled her from producing TV programmes to reinventing science publishing.
Colleagues, funders and institutions can support pregnant researchers in a variety of ways.
The growth of preprints in the life sciences has been reported widely and is driving policy changes for journals and funders, but little quantitative information has been published about preprint usage. Here, we report how we collected and analyzed data on all 37,648 preprints uploaded to bioRxiv.org, the largest biology-focused preprint server, in its first five years.
A workshop run by DORA identified a number of ways to reduce bias in hiring and funding decisions.
The eLife Early-Career Advisory Group open applications for researchers who wish to join the second edition of the community advocacy programme.
New software enables the rapid submission of manuscripts for initial assessment.
An analysis of review, promotion and tenure documents from 129 US and Canadian universities suggests institutions could better fulfill their public missions by changing how they incentivize the public dimensions of faculty work.
Blending the traditional manuscript with live code, data and interactive figures, eLife showcases a new way for researchers to tell their full story.
Many papers in basic biomedical science do not contain the information that is needed to determine what statistical tests were used and to verify the results of these tests.
Collaborating on the development of Texture brings eLife a step closer to its open-source, end-to-end publisher workflow.
An analysis of papers in which two or more authors shared first-author position found that male authors were more likely than female authors to appear first in the author list.
The postdoctoral community is an essential component of the academic and scientific workforce, but a lack of data about this community has made it difficult to develop policies to address concerns about salaries, working conditions, diversity and career development, and to evaluate the impact of existing policies. A recent study aims to address this gap.
By helping scientists gamify the crowdsourcing of data analysis, SwipesForScience will engage the community to speed up research.
Find out how scholarly articles are cited on Wikipedia with WikiCiteVis.
There should be a prominent place for theory within biology papers, both as Results in papers that combine experiment and theory, and as Results in theory papers.
Early-career researchers can learn about peer review by discussing preprints at journal clubs and sending feedback to the authors.
For the first time, nearly all scholarly literature is available gratis to anyone with an Internet connection, suggesting the toll access business model may become unsustainable.
Repurposing continuous integration tools for scientific analyses takes the headache out of reproducible research.
Tackling unconscious bias is a major challenge for journals and the rest of the scientific community.