When privacy-bound research pays for open science
A new open science business model charges those who want to keep information private to subsidise those who share it

Send us a link
A new open science business model charges those who want to keep information private to subsidise those who share it
The interface between science and business is where innovation is brought to life, but do the two fields always get along?
Disruptive innovation has to be accompanied by social and cultural progress.
A wealth of opinions describing what remains to be done to resolve gender issues.
Drivers of research may need to be tweaked to ensure better contribution to society.
Public funding made available for research after the WWII were expected to lead to industrial development, economic growth, and a general improvement of living standards. Yet, this model has been questioned for a few year.
Experts in science policy from across Europe, have expressed some nuanced scepticism at the new EC scientific advice mechanism.
Never thought of being gender biased when performing evaluations? Take the implicit association test.
Accounting and working with budget numbers isn't always that boring as it appears to be, especially if it's spiced up with marketing. A good example is the debate on the budget of Horizon 2020.
Peer-review of projects dominates when it comes to decision on how to allocate funding for science. But is it really the best way?
For all the talk that the publishers of major journals such as Science, Nature and the Lancet are charging too much for their wares, it seems a limit has been reached.
A special issue of the EuroScientist focusing on the evolving solution for research evaluation