In the wake of attacks on the research enterprise, scientists need to focus on protecting its fragile infrastructure.

By denying the realities of sex, gender, and race, the White House's statements worsen inequity and cause harm.

Defending the practice of science from its adversaries will require dealing with some uncomfortable truths.

As scientists struggle to connect with the public, they must consider new models for making research more accessible.

Should citizens decide on risky science? To explore this question of public consent and risky science, two experts with differing opinions share their points of view, in an effort to find some common ground.

The 2024 awards offer a unique look into the present and future of scientific innovation, including the rise of AI.

The debate over the teaching of history in schools portends a future war on ideas that includes the natural sciences.

If artificial intelligence-created content floods the internet, who decides what online information is worth archiving?

Policymakers should communicate how science informs their values and priorities in weighing policy trade-offs.

The scramble to get academic research funded contributes to society's inability to handle issues such as climate change.

Large language models used in AI bots like ChatGTP have made an old debate about data democracy relevant again.

High turnover among research coordinators can slow the progress of clinical studies. Standardizing the role could help.

Scientists who spend time peer-reviewing manuscripts don't get rewarded for their efforts. It's time to change that.

When recruiting study volunteers online, how can researchers deal with participants who fake their identities?

The powerful AI-driven software from DeepMind was released without making its code openly available to scientists.

To learn about how the human brain perceives music, researchers must expand studies beyond Western music and culture.

Debating scientific topics in a courtroom setting could be a way to inform and engage citizens in public policy.

Reforming the rules for the Nobel Prizes would help correct historical injustices and inspire future scientists.

To speed information sharing, many scientists are posting paper drafts directly online. What are the potential downsides of that?