Send us a link

Subscribe to our newsletter

A Standardized Citation Metrics Author Database Annotated for Scientific Field

A Standardized Citation Metrics Author Database Annotated for Scientific Field

Citation metrics are widely used and misused. This Community Page article presents a publicly available database that provides standardized information on multiple citation indicators and a composite thereof, annotating each author according to his/her main scientific field(s).

Data Sharing: Better for Everyone, Especially You!! | PLOS Biologue

Data Sharing: Better for Everyone, Especially You!! | PLOS Biologue

Happy Open Data Day 2019! It's that special day of the year again! Well, every day should be Open Data Day, but today lots of motivated folk come together around the world to remind us all why Open Data, Open Science, and sharing of data and science in general is better for everyone. Better for reuse, better for tracking public money flows, better for open mapping and development, and also, lest we lost sight, better for the researcher who produced the data! Why better for the researchers who generated the data? Better because the value add from sharing is multifold. Others can reuse and reanalyse your data. If you've placed the data in a repository with a persistent identifier, you'll get attributed when they are reused and you can get credit for this - and even citations. What may not be immediately obvious is that taking a little bit of time to ensure your data are 'sharable' is good practise that ensures that when you want to use

Models Highlight Inherent Inefficiencies of Scientific Funding Competitions

Models Highlight Inherent Inefficiencies of Scientific Funding Competitions

Scientists waste substantial time writing grant proposals, potentially squandering much of the scientific value of funding programs. This Meta-Research Article shows that, unfortunately, grant-proposal competitions are inevitably inefficient when the number of awards is small, but efficiency can be restored by awarding funds through a modified lottery, or by weighting past research success more heavily in funding decisions.

Science Without Publication Paywalls: cOAlition S for the Realisation of Full and Immediate Open Access

Science Without Publication Paywalls: cOAlition S for the Realisation of Full and Immediate Open Access

In this Perspective, a group of national funders, joined by the European Commission and the European Research Council, announce plans to make Open Access publishing mandatory for recipients of their agencies' research funding.

PLOS and Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Enter Agreement to Enable Preprint Posting on bioRxiv

PLOS and Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Enter Agreement to Enable Preprint Posting on bioRxiv

In order to better serve authors, an agreement between the two organizations outlines broader use of bioRxiv for preprints of papers submitted to PLOS journals.

Imagining The "Open" University: Sharing Scholarship to Improve Research and Education

Imagining The "Open" University: Sharing Scholarship to Improve Research and Education

This Perspective article argues that universities should take action to support open scholarship that benefits society and to return to their core missions of knowledge dissemination, community engagement, and public good.

Ambra, the PLOS Journal Publishing Platform, is Open Again

Ambra, the PLOS Journal Publishing Platform, is Open Again

Ambra is an innovative Open Source platform for publishing Open Access research articles. It provides features for post-publication discussion and versioned articles that allows for a “living” document around which further scientific discoveries can be made. The platform is in active development by PLOS (Public Library of Science) and is licensed under the MIT License.

Why Having a (Nonfinancial) Interest Is Not a Conflict of Interest

Why Having a (Nonfinancial) Interest Is Not a Conflict of Interest

A current debate about conflicts of interest related to biomedical research is to question whether the focus on financial conflicts of interest overshadows “nonfinancial” interests that could put scientific judgment at equal or greater risk of bias.

Accelerating Translational Research through Open Science

Accelerating Translational Research through Open Science

Seeking to accelerate research advances and reimagine its role in the community, the Montreal Neurological Institute (Neuro) announced in the spring of 2016 that it is launching a five-year experiment during which it will adopt Open Science—open data, open materials, and no patenting—across the institution.

Rosalind’s Ghost: Biology, Collaboration, and the Female

Rosalind’s Ghost: Biology, Collaboration, and the Female

Women are still underrepresented in terms of authorships, including first and/or last authorships (whichever is more prestigious), coauthorships, and in the granting of scientific prizes.

Current Incentives for Scientists Lead to Underpowered Studies with Erroneous Conclusions

Current Incentives for Scientists Lead to Underpowered Studies with Erroneous Conclusions

Researchers acting to maximise their fitness should spend most of their effort seeking novel results and conduct small studies that have only 10%–40% statistical power. As a result, half of the studies they publish will report erroneous conclusions. Current incentive structures are in conflict with maximising the scientific value of research; we suggest ways that the scientific ecosystem could be improved.

Differences in Collaboration Patterns across Discipline, Career Stage, and Gender

Differences in Collaboration Patterns across Discipline, Career Stage, and Gender

An empirical analysis of researchers’ publications reveals that females have fewer distinct coauthors yet have a lower chance of repeating previous coauthors than their male counterparts.