Send us a link

Subscribe to our newsletter

Revealed: the Millions of Dollars in Time Wasted Making Papers Fit Journal Guidelines

Revealed: the Millions of Dollars in Time Wasted Making Papers Fit Journal Guidelines

For scientists submitting their papers to journals, there’s an all-too-familiar drill: spend hours formatting the paper to meet the journal’s guidelines; if the paper is rejected, sink more time into reformatting it for another journal; repeat. Now an analysis has put a price tag on all that busy work.

Stop Congratulating Colleagues for Publishing in High-Impact Factor Journals

Stop Congratulating Colleagues for Publishing in High-Impact Factor Journals

The current scholarly publishing system is detrimental to the pursuit of knowledge and needs a radical shift. There have already been many attempts and partial successes to drive a new shift in scholarly publishing. Many of them should be further developed and generalised.

'Zombie Papers' Just Won't Die. Retracted Papers by Notorious Fraudster Still Cited Years Later

'Zombie Papers' Just Won't Die. Retracted Papers by Notorious Fraudster Still Cited Years Later

Authors who cited flawed work often fail to warn readers.

Systematize Information on Journal Policies and Practices - A Call to Action

Systematize Information on Journal Policies and Practices - A Call to Action

Recently the creators of Transpose and the Platform for Responsible Editorial Policies convened an online workshop on infrastructures that provide information on scholarly journals. In this blog post they look back at the workshop and discuss next steps.

"TOP Factor" Rates Journals on Transparency, Openness

"TOP Factor" Rates Journals on Transparency, Openness

A new tool, created by the advocacy organization Center for Open Science, seeks to change editorial practices. Journals are scored based on ten different criteria, including availability of data and policies on preregistration.

Journal Brand and Research Culture

Journal Brand and Research Culture

Opinion: Things are not right in the culture of research, and that this is ultimately to the detriment of research. Two issues emerge: the huge complexity of the research ecosystem, and the related problem of collective action that this complexity creates.

Inferring the Causal Effect of Journals on Citations

Inferring the Causal Effect of Journals on Citations

Articles in high-impact journals are by definition more highly cited on average. But are they cited more often because the articles are somehow "better"? Or are they cited more often simply because they appeared in a high-impact journal?

Impact Factor Volatility to a Single Paper: A Comprehensive Analysis of 11639 Journals

Impact Factor Volatility to a Single Paper: A Comprehensive Analysis of 11639 Journals

Study find that Impact Factors (IF) are highly volatile. For example, one in ten journals had their IF boosted by more than 50% by their top three cited papers.

Negotiating with Scholarly Journal Publishers: A Toolkit

Negotiating with Scholarly Journal Publishers: A Toolkit

A North American framework for creating transformative change in the scholarly publishing industry based on initial insights from the University of California's 2018-19 negotiations with Elsevier.

Aim and Scope - SURE Journal

Aim and Scope - SURE Journal

The Series of Unsurprising Results in Economics (SURE) is an e-journal of high-quality research with "unsurprising" findings. We publish scientifically important and carefully-executed studies with statistically insignificant or otherwise unsurprising results. Studies from all fields of Economics will be considered. SURE is an open-access journal and there are no submission charges. SURE benefits readers by: Mitigating the … Continue reading Aim and Scope →

Rethinking Impact Factors: New Pathways in Journal Metrics

Rethinking Impact Factors: New Pathways in Journal Metrics

Diversity, transparency, and reliability are essential principles to ensure that a proliferation of metrics does not distort the scholarly communication system, but leads to more granular and transparent assessments

How Former Elsevier Editors Started a Community-led Publisher and Launched Their First OA Journal

How Former Elsevier Editors Started a Community-led Publisher and Launched Their First OA Journal

After serving as editor-in-chief of an Elsevier journal for over seven years, Lajos Balogh decided to channel his publishing knowledge to a new endeavor. He and a group of fellow editors started a publishing organization and journal of their own.